First developed in the 1970s, digital photography appeared in two kinds of image-capturing devices: standard digital cameras and scanners. A digital camera captures an entire subject in one single exposure. A scanner however, captures an image by use of a sequence. The scanner's sensor moves over the subject and photographs it line by line.  This is assembled into a composite image using software. These inventions have allowed photographers to push the bounds of photography.  The work I do is sometimes referred to as Scanography or Scanner Photography.  

Since these technologies were first developed, artists have been working with them and experimenting with a wide variety of possibility.  Digital camera technology became a mainstream technology quickly.  It has in fact more or less replaced film photography for common use.  Why not?  Once you have a digital camera you don't have the expense of film and making prints of every image.  You also don't need ever deal with harsh and environmentally difficult chemistry.  Digital cameras are pervasive and even built into our phones.  We've become an image driven society whether we acknowledge it or not.  In fact, the term "selfie" was added to the dictionary recently.  Still, not all digital photographs are art and not all digital photographers are artists.  There is more to an image than its technology.  

Scanner technology on the other hand, is not quite so mainstream.  One might have a scanner in their home but odds are if you do it is likely part of a scan-print-fax office machine.  And while that is a form of scanner it isn't the type of scanner that I use.  I use a flatbed photographic scanner.  The kind made for scanning film, slides and images.  It has the capability to scan at very high resolutions which can yield impressive detail in an image.

I recently read about an artist who has created a slit scan camera of his own using the sensor from a scanner like mine. He also developed some very interesting software to create his fantastic body of work. This Hungarian artist, Adam Magyar, has created a body of work including images created in the New York Subway system that are remarkable.  HIs project, called Stainless, created high resolution imagery of speeding subway trains and passengers seemingly suspended in time.  The images are hauntingly beautiful and are filled with a detail that no ordinary camera can capture.  This is one of the things that excites me about scanner technology as a tool for art making.  The imagery can capture more than a standard digital camera can see and record.  It is both a celebration of minute detail and that which we do not ordinarily notice or see. Check out Adam's work.  It's very different than mine but it shares a common thread, a scanner.

My solo show, Skin/Deep is done.  This body of work exploring the concept of concealing and revealing presented 19 allegorical images at Exhibit A Contemporary Art in Corning, NY.  I feel the show was a success.  Happily I sold some work.  The show also generated a really nice article written by Jeff Murray in the Elmira Star Gazette and Binghamton Press Sun Bulletin.  Most importantly, I was able to share the work I've been creating for the past year with the public.  For me, that's the most important part.  When I was a graduate student studying Photography, one of my professors said that showing your work to the public was the part that made it real.  However, she also said that when you show your work it no longer belongs to just you.  When you show your work it belongs to the audience, the public.  I may create work with one thought in mind but when it hangs in a gallery or in a museum, the work is open to whatever interpretation the viewer makes.  I think that idea scares many artists.  There can be a fear that your message doesn't come across.  

For me however, that has always been the most exciting part.  I know what every work means to me, because I was there when it was made.  But in the end that isn't what is important to me.  What is important to me is what the work might mean to you, the viewer.  Which pieces move you?  Which ones provoke thought?  Which works puzzle or confuse you?  Are there works that make you laugh or make you cry?  Are their works that spur you to action or make you consider something in a new and different way?  Are there works that you'd like to live with?  Which works conjure up a story in your mind and what are those stories?

In the end, my hope is that in looking at my work, you can find something in it that moves you, makes you react, affirms you and helps you to feel humanized.  I'm posting a slide show here of the work from the show and I invite your feedback in the form of your thoughts, observations, assumptions, stories or questions.  If nothing else, art should start a conversation. Let's get this conversation started.